Let’s start by clearing up a misconception: Rigor isn’t unfriendly. Adding it to your class doesn’t mean you become boring, a techie, or overseer of a fun-free zone. In fact, done right, rigor fills your class with Wow, those epiphanies that bring a smile to student faces and a sense of well-being to their school day. Rigor provides positive experiences, is an emotional high, and engenders a pervasive sense of accomplishment students will carry for years–and use as a template for future events.
It is NOT:
- lots of homework
- lots of projects
- lots of resources
- lots of rules
When those are used to define rigor, the teacher is flailing–thinking quantity is quality. Rigor is not about adding a column of data or remembering the main characters in a Shakespeare novel. It’s seeing how that knowledge connects to life, to circumstances and to daily problems.
Simply put, adding rigor creates an environment where students are:
- expected to learn at high levels
- supported so they can learn at high levels
- cheered on as they demonstrate learning at high levels
It helps students understand how to live life using brain power as the engine. Sure, it will ask them to collect evidence and draw conclusions that may find disagreement among their peers. It will insist they defend a position or adjust it to reflect new information. And it will often move them outside their comfort zone. It will also prepare them to solve the problems they will face in the future.
How do you as a teacher do that–add rigor? Here are some ideas from my PLN colleagues:
- Make it easy to decode words (by adding an online dictionary or a backchannel that students can access with unknown words)
- Build grit in students. Let them know they are capable, competent, that thinking hard does not mean they didn’t understand. It means they want to understand.
- Expect inquiry. Be prepared. Make time for it.
- When you ask a question, pause. Let students think before answering. This wait time isn’t delaying your lesson. In a rigorous classroom, it is the lesson.
- Expect rigor–don’t allow students to be satisfied with a superficial answer. Build habits that look for understanding.
- Face unknown questions with a smile. Make the classroom a safe, non-judgmental learning environment where students can practice their critical thinking skills.
- Require students do projects with a high degree of precision and skill.
- Make it normal to invent solutions that haven’t been thought of before, but satisfy requirements.
- Expect students to double-check both the approach and result (according to Grant Wiggins–great article)
- Create an environment conducive to personal growth. Know what that means for each student.
- Focus on exceptional expectations.
- As students participate in class conversations, expect them to use academic and domain-specific vocabulary. If they use words like ‘something’, ‘you know’, ‘that’, or ‘like’, prod them to come up with specifics. Like what? No I don’t know. This immerses them in learning, discovering, and thinking critically.
- As students answer questions, expect evidence to support their answer. This can come from personal experience, but more often will find relevance from learning resources.
- Listen to student answers. Pay attention. Challenge them to be thorough.
- Don’t draw conclusions for students. Present them with evidence. See where it takes them.
- Expect students to build on classmate comments and understand their perspectives.
- Support students so they can reach high expectations. If they are thinking outside the box, don’t pull them back in. Ask questions: Is this approach going to meet expectations, solve problems, achieve desired results? If it is, let them do it!
- Provide a way for each student to demonstrate learning even if it isn’t a way you’ve thought of. Applaud them if they devise an approach that works for them.
- Differentiate for student needs. If you have a project that seems to fit everyone, it doesn’t. How do I know that? Because no project does.
- Expect students to analyze data during reading. Ask why–determine if the author provided proof or simply made a statement–and know the difference.
- Expect problem solving. Don’t jump in to solve problems. Provide students with strategies they can use and let them try them.
- Remind students that ‘easy’ occurs through hard work. Discuss this–how they excelled at soccer, piano, or the violin through tenacity and drive. Have students share their experiences.
For more on higher-order thinking, check out NWEA’s education blog. As I researched this post, I kept running across Barbara Blackburn‘s name. You might want to check her out for more in-depth materials.
–first published on TeachHUB
More on classroom management:
What’s the Classroom of the Future Look Like?
What’s Tomorrow’s Student Look Like
How to Prepare Students for PARCC Tests
Jacqui Murray has been teaching K-8 technology for 15 years. She is the editor/author of dozens of tech ed resources including a K-8 technology curriculum, K-8 keyboard curriculum, K-8 Digital Citizenship curriculum, and dozens of books on how to integrate technology into education. She is webmaster for six blogs, CSG Master Teacher, an Amazon Vine Voice book reviewer, Editorial Review Board member for Journal for Computing Teachers, CAEP reviewer, CSTA presentation reviewer, freelance journalist on tech ed topics, a tech ed columnist for Examiner.com, and a weekly contributor to TeachHUB. You can find her resources at Structured Learning.
Jacqui Murray is the author of the popular Building a Midshipman, the story of her daughter’s journey from high school to United States Naval Academy, and the thriller, To Hunt a Sub. She is also the author/editor of over a hundred books on integrating tech into education, adjunct professor of technology in education, webmaster for four blogs, an Amazon Vine Voice book reviewer, a columnist for TeachHUB, monthly contributor to Today’s Author and a freelance journalist on tech ed topics. You can find her books at her publisher’s website, Structured Learning. The sequel to To Hunt a Sub, Twenty-four Days, will be out this summer. Jacqui Murray has been teaching K-8 technology for 15 years. She is the editor/author of over a hundred tech ed resources including a K-8 technology curriculum, K-8 keyboard curriculum, K-8 Digital Citizenship curriculum. She is an adjunct professor in tech ed, CSG Master Teacher, webmaster for four blogs, an Amazon Vine Voice book reviewer, Editorial Review Board member for Journal for Computing Teachers, CAEP reviewer, CSTA presentation reviewer, freelance journalist on tech ed topics, and a weekly contributor to TeachHUB. You can find her resources at Structured Learning.